EPA weakens PFAS drinking water limits. What it means for Michigan

Federal environmental regulators announced plans Wednesday to roll back PFAS drinking water standards established by the Biden administration, contending the cost of compliance would be too high. Photo via iStock.
by Kelly House, (Bridge Michigan)
The Trump administration has announced plans to rescind drinking-water limits on four PFAS 鈥渇orever chemical鈥 compounds while extending the compliance deadline for two others, in a move that outraged victims of Michigan widespread PFAS contamination.
Nationwide regulations limiting allowable levels of PFOA and PFOS 鈥 two of the most common among thousands of PFAS compounds 鈥 now won鈥檛 take effect until 2031, which is two years later than previously scheduled. There will no longer be a federal limit on PFHxS, PFNA, GenX or PFBS, four other compounds that the Biden administration had moved to regulate last year.
Michigan state-level drinking water standards will continue to limit the compounds that the federal government no longer wants to regulate. However, several of those state-level standards are weaker than the federal ones the EPA is rescinding.
Biden EPA created听the nation first enforceable drinking water limits on PFAS听in 2024, responding to mounting evidence that has linked various PFAS compounds听to cancer and other health risks. Water systems were given until 2029 to comply.
In a statement Wednesday, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin called that deadline too aggressive and said the Trump administration planned extension would offer 鈥渃ommon-sense flexibility” while drinking water providers take measures to stay beneath the limits.
鈥淭his will support water systems across the country, including small systems in rural communities, as they work to address these contaminants,鈥 he added.
The announcement drew cheers from national groups representing water utilities, which have raised concerns about high costs to install PFAS filtration systems, and outrage from PFAS activists who called the rollbacks a victory for chemical companies at the expense of Americans鈥 health.
鈥淭hese actions will undoubtedly make the drinking water of millions of people across the country less safe,鈥 said Tony Spaniola, co-chair of the Great Lakes PFAS Action Network.
If the EPA follows through on its plans, he said, lawsuits are likely to follow.
鈥淲e haven’t heard the last of this by any stretch of the imagination,鈥 he said, 鈥渂ut man, I would much rather be in the position we were in a year ago, when these things were moving forward and we had a Justice Department and an EPA that was going to vigorously defend them.鈥
Known as 鈥渇orever chemicals鈥 because they don鈥檛 break down easily in the environment, PFAS 鈥听short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances 鈥 have been heavily used by industry and present in common household products for decades. While some PFAS manufacturers knew long ago that their products were toxic, the chemicals went largely unregulated until recently, when a widening contamination crisis began to make headlines in Michigan and around the globe.
The most heavily polluted sites are associated with the military and industry, including paper mills, metal plating operations, textile manufacturers and airports. All have a significant presence in Michigan, which is home to听347 known or suspected sites听of PFAS contamination.
If the EPA follows through with its planned rollbacks, Michigan drinking water will remain better protected against PFAS than the water in most other states, because state officials took the unusual step in 2020 of enacting their own drinking water standards for听seven compounds.
However, some of those state-level limits are weaker than the limits enacted by Biden EPA, and their future听hangs in the balance听after chemical company 3-M sued the state in hopes of voiding them.
鈥榊ears of progress鈥
In Oscoda, where PFAS used on a now-defunct Air Force base has听caused widespread groundwater and surface water contamination, one of the main sources of pollution would now be left unregulated at the federal level. Michigan limit for that compound, known as PFHxS, is far less stringent.
Spaniola, who owns a cabin in Oscoda, said the plan to lift limits on several PFAS chemicals 鈥渦ndoes years of progress鈥 to protect the health of residents in Oscoda and other communities.
Leaders of the Association of State Drinking Water Administrators and the National Rural Water Association, which represent drinking water providers, lauded Wednesday announcement of a deadline extension.
Several groups representing drinking water providers had sued the federal government over the Biden-era PFAS standards, arguing that the cost of filtering PFAS out of drinking water will be too high. It not clear whether those lawsuits will continue in light of Wednesday announcement.
Representatives of Michigan drinking water sector had a more muted reaction.
鈥淚鈥漨 neither jumping for nor totally cheering against it,鈥 said Rick Solle, board director of the Michigan section of the American Water Works Association.
Solle, who oversees public services in听Plainfield Township, is no stranger to the high costs of PFAS contamination 鈥 both in terms of dollars and residents鈥 health. It cost $5 million for his water system to install a carbon filtration system that strips away PFAS contamination caused by the shoe company Wolverine Worldwide.
Wolverine agreed to cover those costs in a legal settlement, but Solle noted that many other communities will be forced to pay for PFAS filtration on their own, meaning water rates could rise.
The PFAS changes are part of a broader deregulatory push by the Trump EPA, an agency created to rein in industry pollution that Trump has staffed with industry-friendly appointees including former lobbyists for the chemical and oil industries.
The agency new leadership has vowed to make the EPA a business-friendlier agency, and has followed up by firing staff en masse and planning rollbacks of听a wide variety of anti-pollution regulations, from limits on vehicle emissions to wastewater controls for coal-fired power plants.
This article is being republished through a syndication agreement with听Bridge Michigan. Bridge Michigan听is Michigan largest nonprofit news service and one of the nation leading and largest nonprofit civic news providers. Their coverage is nonpartisan, fact-based, and data-driven. Find them online at听听.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login